Our Methodology
The problem we often encounter is the lack of a connection between EdTech research and design. Research shows that many popular EdTech products are not designed with research principles in mind (Hirsh-Pasek et al., 2015), and this disconnect leads to products that have minimal or even negative impacts on learners.
The Centre's researchers represent multiple disciplines, and we encourage the implementation of diverse research methodologies to address specific research and design questions. We connect researchers and developers through a careful match-making system, drawing on a database of 1500 researchers. We follow a range of methods, depending on the problem or question we are answering and the context and type of research. Our methods include participatory and child-centred design , design-based research (DBR), user experience research (UXR), feasibility and usability studies, rapid A/B (or A/B/N) testing with experimental comparisons of at least two conditions, randomized controlled trials, qualitative observation studies, ethnographic observations, as well as action research with teachers.
Science of Learning principles
As inspired by Richard Mayer’s theory and extensive research in his lab
Check out this paper
Participatory research
As inspired by Alison Druin’s work on child-centred design and participatory R&D
Check out the CRC principles
While the learning sciences provide the basis for learning engineering, they are not sufficient on their own. Therefore, we follow a range of disciplines and methodologies, matching domain experts and methodological approaches to the specific problem we are solving or question we are asking. We always start with a theory of change and logic model to establish the connection between published research and the design features of the product. Despite its significance, many founders overlook this foundational step. It helps determine which outcomes to prioritize, why they matter, and offers insights into potential remedial actions if desired outcomes are not achieved.
Our History
Our Structure
Our Centre is part of the global EdTech movement for evidence- the international consensus that good evidence and effective implementation have the power to change education. External evaluations are becoming a standard part of operations in international EdTech markets: funders and schools demand a scientific proof that an educational technology is truly “educational”. We provide EdTech with an independent verification of impact and support them to integrate science into their design and products. When evaluating the educational impact of a product, we aggregate scientific findings with teachers' knowledge and when possible, children's reports. Read our pledge to the EdTech ecosystem to learn more about our values and approach.